Australian referendum, 1977 (Retirement of Judges)
The legislation Constitution Alteration (Retirement of Judges) 1977 proposed to create a retirement
age of 70 for judges in federal courts.
The question was put to a referendum in the Australian referendum, 1977.
Results
It is proposed to alter the Constitution so as to provide for retiring
ages for judges of federal courts.
Do you approve the proposed law?
Result
| State |
On
rolls |
Ballots
issued |
For |
Against |
Informal |
| |
% |
|
% |
| New South Wales |
3,007,511 |
2,774,388 |
2,316,999 |
%84.84 |
414,070 |
%15.16 |
43,319 |
| Victoria |
2,252,831 |
2,083,136 |
1,659,273 |
%81.43 |
378,505 |
%18.57 |
45,358 |
| Queensland |
1,241,426 |
1,138,842 |
734,183 |
%65.24 |
391,227 |
%34.76 |
13,432 |
| South Australia |
799,243 |
745,990 |
622,760 |
%85.57 |
104,987 |
%14.43 |
18,243 |
| Western Australia |
682,291 |
617,463 |
472,228 |
%78.37 |
130,307 |
%21.63 |
14,928 |
| Tasmania |
259,081 |
246,063 |
174,951 |
%72.46 |
66,478 |
%27.54 |
4,634 |
| Total for Commonwealth |
8,242,383 |
7,605,882 |
5,980,394 |
%80.10 |
1,485,574 |
%19.90 |
139,914 |
| Obtained majority in all six States and an overall
majority of 4 494 820 votes. |
| Carried |
Discussion
In October 1976 the Senate Standing Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs recommended a retiring age for all federal judges. This recommendation was based on
- a perceived need 'to maintain vigorous and dynamic courts'
- a need to open up avenues for 'able legal practitioners' to achieve judicial positions
- a growing community belief in a compulsory retiring age for judges
- avoiding 'the unfortunate necessity' of removing a judge made unfit for office by declining health.
The committee's view was accepted by the Australian Constitutional Convention soon after.
The amendment introduced in the following year sought to provide for a retiring age of seventy for all federal court judges, including those on the High Court-though not judges appointed before the approval of the referendum. The issue was not controversial, despite Sir Robert Menzies' description of the change as 'superficial and ill-considered'. Over 80 per cent of voters supported the amendment:
- It appears that in Australia, age provokes a reaction of vacation rather than reverence, and the electorate saw no reason to make an exception of High Court judges.
See Also
Last updated: 05-28-2005 23:55:14
Last updated: 01-04-2007 01:18:57
|
